Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Steve:
I don't think I like the direction this discussion is taking.


I'm having a good time.


The Toilet Decals seller has good terms: Free shipping and the 4th sheet is free.

Am I the only one that gets the feeling that basrah is oli reincarnated? Similar humor and "weird" stuff. Both, from England, I think?
Maybe I'm the only one - again? But basrah seems to have VERY close ties with oli. I'm starting to think I'm playing that game (I think it's "Clue") where you have to figure out who the killer is. Even basrah's latest picture might be the same guy in the previous picture that basrah left. I'm pretty sure that basrah is a trickster, or a conjurer. Maybe I'm to young to figure this out. Do we have a great-granny or a gramps that understands the basrah-oli connection?

Mrs. M - You know, if you hadn't shown up, these morning socials wouldn't have happened. SO THANKS!
Last edited {1}
quote:
Originally posted by rsmiller40:
Yes, well, is that a good thing or a bad thing?


GOOD!

The 3 of us seem to be enjoying ourselves. We have similar morning schedules. No one has complained. I don't know of any rule that we're breaking (and sometimes we even answer sniping questions!). Also, since Steve is the senior forum member, anything he's involved with must be "good".
Last edited {1}
Nope, that's still fallacious. A syllogism is based on the "if...then" principle. If this is true, then that also must be true. That works in mathematics, but in linguistics it's fraught with danger. "If it's raining, then the sun isn't shining." False. Ever hear of a "sun shower?" Where do rainbows come from? There is rarely an absolute in generalizations.

That's my lecture for the day. There will be a quiz. Big Grin
But, if ALL generalizations, including THIS ONE, are false, doesn't that make THIS ONE true, thus allowing us an infinite number of posts discussing the changing state of this topic?

Isn't that kind of like repeated halving of the distance between two point never allows the two point to connect? And, if that's the case, wouldn't both of those generalizations be "true"?
Rick asks, "But, if ALL generalizations, including THIS ONE, are false, doesn't that make THIS ONE true, thus allowing us an infinite number of posts discussing the changing state of this topic?"

No. An exception can be found to any generalization; therefore no generalization can be true in all cases. And I refuse to participate in an exchange of posts about the Heraclitean Flux. Wink
Mrs. M,

As a result of this latest exchange with Steve, I've come to two conclusions:
1) Steve may have, or could, do something that's not good for this forum.
2) Since Steve and I burned up 7 posts on a discussion of ceramics, I think your posts have been a "good" thing.

I think you remind many of us of our own grannies (Steve REALLY reminds me of my gramps), so you're in "good" (I think Steve will nail me on that word) company. I find your posts entertaining, and it's a lot better then those with the angry faces.

Also, who in their right minds would criticize a sweet great-grandmother. Actually, something you might do would be considered hip, where as for someone else it wouldn't. I kind of envy you. It doesn't seem to work for older men, commonly called "The old f _ _ t" (redundant phrase).

It appears that if you keep the language fairly clean, or if you DO use a 4 letter word that it's OK if you use the hangman method. Or with initials, asterisks, dollar signs, and blanks you can say about anything (I've always wondered why that is).
Last edited {1}

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×