Skip to main content

I found the following in an auction that I was looking at:

quote:
HELP STOP SNIPERS!
SNIPERS ARE NOT WELCOME TO BID ON MY ITEMS - I DO NOT WANT YOUR BUSINESS
If I determine that a winning bidder has used sniping software, they will be placed on my blocked bidders list and will receive negative feedback.


ebay


I think the seller has a problem in that they really do not want top dollar; ie, a snipe is going to raise the final bid amount. Duh!

"The waist is a terrible thing to mind"
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Moved six months ago to another state--NO desire to move anytime soon, but must do so to permanent house this summer. Yecch!


Ick!! Will that be the last move for a while?? I hope so for your sake. I hate moving with a passion now, 4 moves in as many years. Next move I will just pay someone to do the whole darn lot Smile

Lexie
Unless the bidder admits to such, how would the seller determine if the bidder MANUALLY sniped his item (which presumably is acceptable) or used sniping software (which apparently is totally unacceptable to the seller!?)?

Somehow, I think the diatribe against snipers is more to impress his non-sniping bidder/buyers than to chase away snipers?! Wink

Jabbergah                                                    
on Anti-snipe seller.

I just looked at about 200 listings by the seller since the new year. The vast majority of the listings, if not all, listed/sold < $20. Only a FRACTION of the listings SOLD, and only 3 of those sold had more than ONE bidder! Items are not in high demand -- why would a sniper WASTE a snipe on any of these items when they can pick them up for a proxy bid? In one auction, a buyer SNIPED himself! >LookHere< I wonder if the seller didn't sell to him?

As Mrs.M mentioned, it would be interesting to snipe/win this guy's auction and see what he would do. I bet NOTHING if the sniper was the ONLY bidder, which is how near ALL his auctions end.

Jabbergah                                                    
quote:
Originally posted by Jabbergah:

I just looked at about 200 listings by the seller since the new year. The vast majority of the listings, if not all, listed/sold < $20. Only a FRACTION of the listings SOLD, and only 3 of those sold had more than ONE bidder! Items are not in high demand -- why would a sniper WASTE a snipe on any of these items when they can pick them up for a proxy bid? In one auction, a buyer SNIPED himself! http://offer.ebay.com/ws3/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewBids&item=2214773773 I wonder if the seller didn't sell to him?



I don't consider using a snipe "wasting" it, even when I feel confident that I will be the only bidder. I view the snipe as insurance--an opportunity to maximize my chance of winning--and I am more than willing to pay the small AS fee (in this case, a mere 25 cents). Even if the item were $700, I would gladly pay a few extra dollars to maximize my probability. That is why I always let AS snipe, no matter what--better to pay a few extra cents to be almost sure, than to take a chance and proxy bid, only to find another another sniper lurking out there.
Cool
Last edited {1}
your opinions, Chatter & ToS, I differ somewhat. You believe snipe all the time, every time. I believe there are some situations where sniping is superfluous or overkill. It doesn't hurt to snipe, but it's not really necessary.

If I were in the market for one of the cheap trinkets that this seller in question offers, I would tend NOT snipe it. You look at the seller's other items and find the vast majority end with no bids, the ones that sell are with 1 bid. What's the point in sniping when there is NO competition? And face it, if somebody DOES outbid you, BIG DEAL! The seller will have another one listed tomorrow if not sooner!

I think the seller doesn't have to deal with snipers NOT so much because of his anti-sniper propaganda, but because there is NO DEMAND & NO COMPETITION for his items! When I was looking through his listings, I didn't see anything >I< wanted!

Jabbergah                                                    
His auction says "This postcard is a computer-enhanced reprint" and "We only sell through eBay listings". In other words, he's got a laser-printer in the back room churning these things out as they sell. If by some miracle you get outbid, just wait a day or so. He'll be so thrilled by the "demand", he'll relist.

A snipe would DEFINITELY be overkill.
He replied to my email asking about his anti-sniping stance!

I was particularly taken by the last line!

quote:
Thanks for asking.
A sniper is a person who uses software to hide his bid until the last
possible second in order to win as cheaply as possible.

Snipers are easy to spot.

They never (or almost never) have any open bids. Closed bids are always
filed at almost exactly the same time before an auction ends. That's
because snipers use this software to disguise who they are and what they are
willing to bid in an effort to win items as cheaply as possible - to the
detriment of other buyers and sellers. eBay lets you view the open and
closed bids for anyone. If you are unsure how to do so, send me an email
and I'll help you through the process and you can see what snipers do.

Sniping software is (often) freeware that allows a bidder to enter an eBay
item number, ending date, ending time and a maximum price the bidder is
willing to pay. The software then enters the bidder's price at the end of
the auction - usually within 6 or 7 seconds of the end of it. The
sniper-bidder usually has entered a ridiculously high bid because they know
that eBay's proxy bidding will never get them to that level - eBay only
takes them to the level that is required to win. The sniper software usually
runs on a server somewhere that is always logged on to eBay, so the sniper
never has to look at what's happening to the item he wants.

Snipers claim that it means more business at a higher price for a seller-
and I find this absolutely fallacious. Sometimes they claim that they simply
don't have the time to follow auctions - this is equally fallacious because
eBay's proxy bidding system allows them to do exactly the same thing as
sniping - except that their current bid is open for all to see. Auctions
are supposed to be open and one should know who else is bidding and thus
have the opportunity outbid that competition. Many (perhaps the large
majority) of eBay bidders don't know what sniping is and when they are
outbid at the last second, lament that they might have bid higher had they
known there was more competition. That hurts sellers (like me) a lot.

Here's what eBay says about sniping:
"There is a way to protect yourself from snipers and prevent being outbid at
the last moment. If you bid the absolute maximum you are willing to pay, our
proxy system will do the work for you.

Human nature sometimes makes us resist making the highest bid within our
spending limits, but proxy bidding does work.

There is a common misconception that snipers always win. The truth is that
they don't. To win, they must outbid you. By placing a proxy bid at your
maximum limit, someone else can outbid you only if they are willing to spend
more for the item than you are. " (end of eBay quote). Problem is, most
bidders don't think about using the proxy system - it's counter-intuitive to
auctions and bidding.

I've had snipers tell me that since eBay allows sniping I am breaking eBay's
rules by my stance. My response to them is that eBay also allows false
negative feedback - but that doesn't mean that people should use that kind
of capability. Sniping is secretive; it's devious and an obvious attempt to
assure that the sniper gets the item at the lowest possible price - to the
detriment of both the seller and other bidders. My position is not in
violation of any of eBay's policies. I've been reported to eBay so many
times about this that you wouldn't believe it and yet eBay takes no action
against me. In fact, I just got reported to eBay again (on August 27,
2003). eBay took no action because I'm not violating their rules - despite
what the snipers want to believe. And, eBay's policies also allow me to
determine at my sole discretion to whom I wish to sell - and I block each
and every sniper I find.

Bidding at the last second does NOT make you a sniper by my definition.
Using software to do your bidding secretly on items makes you a sniper.
I'll never give negative feedback to a last second bidder. And, believe me,
snipers are easy to spot - I even send them an email asking them to confirm
it before I take action. So far, I've never given a negative because of
sniping and have only added seven people to my blocked bidders because of
sniping - they really seem to be afraid of my warning on my listings.
Several of them have bid on my items and won - and when I sent them an email
asking if they really want negative feedback, they have sheepishly asked me
to release them from their bids - admitting that they did not read my
warning. One of them turned me in to eBay last month, and guess what - eBay
said (again) that I'm not in violation of their policies. He then decided to
withdraw his bid - not wanting negative feedback.

eBay could fix the problem with snipers by leaving the auction open for some
period of time after the last bid is entered (just as is done in a real
auction). This would cause the sniper software to be of no use to the
sniper since they could never bid at the last second - and those of us who
are honest would always have a chance to top the high bid - thus keeping the
auction open until the true selling price has been bid.

I became the subject of a couple of dialogs among the snipers on eBay not
too long ago. Unfortunately, eBay has terminated the threads so you can't
see what kind of folks these really were. The discussions were worth taking
time read as they moved from attacking me as an anti-sniper to determining
who and what eBay bids should be and finally to bashing gays, democrats,
patriots and anyone else who doesn't meet their standards of behavior. At
least 10 of them tried to get me involved in their conversations. I still
get one or two emails a week telling me what a dastardly person I am because
of my position (you might suspect that their language is uniformly pretty
foul - apparently that's how they communicate). I chose to not respond to
those kinds of immature and narrow-minded individuals - except to report
them to eBay and their email service - and so far, I never hear from them
again. On the other hand (and not too surprisingly) I get over a dozen
emails a week applauding my stance and thanking me.

I'm just a small voice in the wilderness about this, but as both a bidder
and a seller, I really abhor sneaky, dishonest people like snipers.



R2

Last edited {1}
...strategy worked for me again!

Before I get into that, I want to thank R2 for posting the interesting e-mail correspondance with the seller that inspired this topic. R2 pro'lly used that nasty language to the guy that all snipers apparently use! Wink

OK, while some posters on here believe sniping only, all the time, I've maintained that there are times when snipes may not be necessary. Bidding on one of the anti-sniper seller's auctions would be one that comes to mind! (Who wants to bet his being featured here drove more views to his auctions than he's enjoyed in a long time! Wink ) Here's a situation that just worked out for me.

The widget I was interested in is non-collectable, nothing special. There are only 3 - 5 sellers of the item on eBay ALL the time. Maybe 12 - 18 listings at any one time. The seller that offered the item at the lowest price: $19.95 opening bid, no reserve, $24.95 BIN. I want to pay the opening bid -- no more. I place the opening bid at $19.95 2 days before the end of the auction, nothing held in proxy. Auction ends, I'm outbid by 2 bidders, winning bid = $28! Eek Curious, as the same hi-volume seller had an identical item listed in 2 other auctions with the same $19.95 opening bid & $24.95 BIN!

Thinking maybe Chatter was right, I set up a bid group for the item and placed a couple snipes for the remaining items listings at the OPENING BID. Obviously, the only way the snipes could be successfully placed would be if there were NO bidders when my snipes were placed. But in the back of my mind, I was hoping of a specific development, and it arrived in my e-mailbox this morning! A second chance offer from the seller at MY opening bid price! You betcha I'll take it! And at my price, too! Smile

Granted, this strategy will not always work and then only on certain types of items (whose descriptions typically include the phrase "As Seen on TV!" Wink ). Sniping isn't the end-all and be-all, WINNING at your desired price IS! Wink With that in mind, sniping is an important and well-used strategy in my eBay bidding, but it's not the ONLY strategy I use.

I guess if I had to name it, the bid strategy I used above would be "The 2nd-Chance Gambit". Wink
LOL! Sounds like a chess move! Razz

Jabbergah                                                    
My thanks to R2 for emailing to this seller and posting his response. I've been wanting to hear this seller's point of view. There was one mistake in the email - he has left one negative feedback for a sniper on 12/20/03. The buyer left a positive on 12/05 saying, "The finest kind, just a great ebay seller." (seller left an anti-sniping response to that positive on 12/20.)

I respect this seller taking a position on something that is obviously controversial (at least in the ebay sniping part of life). It takes courage to go against the "prevailing wisdom". The success of his policy will be determined by the free-market place.

I have a feeling there are more closet anti-snipers then appears. Maybe I'm the only one that suffers from this, but sometimes I feel that a seller didn't like that I sniped them. They will have great feedback about quick email and quick shipping, even from other buyers on the same day as my auction, but the seller is slow on emailing/shipping to me. It's the uncertainty that bugs me. If the sellers that don't want snipers had more courage to state their position (for or against), I feel that to be a good thing. I'm not keen buying something from someone that doesn't want my business. I would like to know in advance.

Some sellers (I think the smart ones), encourage sniping and warn proxy bidders about snipers. They appear to be encouraging proxy bidders to bid their maximum bid amounts. After all, that's the best "defense" against snipers.

If any one cares about my opinions about sniping, or is bored, do a search on "altruism". You don't even need to enter "Rick" in "Author Name:".

Since discriminating against snipers is not against the law, I have no problem with it. In fact, I wouldn't have a problem if someone discriminates against "Ricks", or even "rick-heads".


"A man can't be too careful in the choice of his enemies." - Oscar Wilde
Last edited {1}
I too find the response from the seller somewhat interesting, even if I do not agree with him. I fail to see why an automated snipe is sneaky, but if I set it in place manually at 30 seconds and click it at 10 or less, it is not. Oh well, guess it keeps life on a roll! Wink

Really excellent quote, Rick! Smile

Last edited {1}

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×