I don't agree that this would be the case in the US, but then I am not a judge.
I’m tempted to say it’s a full time job, but I’m too nice to say that.quote:Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
Then, you won't have to keep correcting me.
At least North Carolina isn’t one of the “two-party consent” states. Washington, D.C. must not be – Nixon could have gotten into some serious trouble.
Some day, perhaps we’ll have little devices attached so that all our conversations will be recorded. Sure would cut down on people with “convenient” memories. People might be a little more circumspect if they knew their conversations were being recorded. And, would be very helpful to biographers.
Lol, I think Nixon was....well his fall guys were in serious trouble!
Rick said:
"Some day, perhaps we’ll have little devices attached so that all our conversations will be recorded. Sure would cut down on people with “convenient” memories. People might be a little more circumspect if they knew their conversations were being recorded. And, would be very helpful to biographers."
I would agree with most of that statement..at least in therory!
Assuming I am where I am at the moment, Yes it is illigal here for a one party taping without the consent of the other party.
Rick said:
"Some day, perhaps we’ll have little devices attached so that all our conversations will be recorded. Sure would cut down on people with “convenient” memories. People might be a little more circumspect if they knew their conversations were being recorded. And, would be very helpful to biographers."
I would agree with most of that statement..at least in therory!
Assuming I am where I am at the moment, Yes it is illigal here for a one party taping without the consent of the other party.
"Most"? What do you disagree with - in theory?quote:Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
I would agree with most of that statement..at least in therory!
You're not in N.C.?quote:Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
Assuming I am where I am at the moment,
quote:Originally posted by Rick:"Most"? What do you disagree with - in theory?quote:Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
I would agree with most of that statement..at least in therory!
I don't like things hanging around my neck and I find that pretty low tec!You're not in N.C.?quote:Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
Assuming I am where I am at the moment,
Hmm, if you read what I said, I think it answers your question.
Which statement was that? Do you mean this? - "I don't like things hanging around my neck and I find that pretty low tec!"quote:Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
Hmm, if you read what I said, I think it answers your question.
Hard time understanding that last post. Seems you got confused with your quoting.
quote:quote:
Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
Assuming I am where I am at the moment,
You're not in N.C.?
Hmm, if you read what I said, I think it answers your question.
That is confusing?
I’ll start over.quote:Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
That is confusing?
quote:Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
Assuming I am where I am at the moment
Are you currently in North Carolina?
“Mostly”? Which part do you disagree with?quote:Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
Rick said:
"Some day, perhaps we’ll have little devices attached so that all our conversations will be recorded. Sure would cut down on people with “convenient” memories. People might be a little more circumspect if they knew their conversations were being recorded. And, would be very helpful to biographers."
I would agree with most of that statement..at least in therory!
quote:quote:
Originally posted by Rick:
quote:
Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
I would agree with most of that statement..at least in therory!
"Most"? What do you disagree with - in theory?
I don't like things hanging around my neck and I find that pretty low tec!
If I were, it would be one party consent!
Let me see if I can summarize this one:
Rick said:
Some day, perhaps we’ll have little devices attached so that all our conversations will be recorded. Sure would cut down on people with “convenient” memories. People might be a little more circumspect if they knew their conversations were being recorded. And, would be very helpful to biographers.
Mrs. M. said:
I would agree with most of that statement..at least in therory!
Rick said:
"Most"? What do you disagree with - in theory?
Mrs. M. said:
I don't like things hanging around my neck and I find that pretty low tec!
Rick said:
Some day, perhaps we’ll have little devices attached so that all our conversations will be recorded. Sure would cut down on people with “convenient” memories. People might be a little more circumspect if they knew their conversations were being recorded. And, would be very helpful to biographers.
Mrs. M. said:
I would agree with most of that statement..at least in therory!
Rick said:
"Most"? What do you disagree with - in theory?
Mrs. M. said:
I don't like things hanging around my neck and I find that pretty low tec!
Those cheaps are in fact relays but because they are very small and as there is no mechanical stuff in it ,it's electronical .
The two mini relays I found like this are made by Nec+cel and fairchild . To answer the last question , They are from USA .
The two mini relays I found like this are made by Nec+cel and fairchild . To answer the last question , They are from USA .
Sorry "CHIP"
There is at least one UK one at:
http://www.cornerspystore.com
also lots of others listed under the search of:
electronic spy equipment.
http://www.cornerspystore.com
also lots of others listed under the search of:
electronic spy equipment.
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply