Skip to main content

In a situation where the goods do not live up to description or expectation, and the seller totally ignores courteous, but ever firmer, emails attempting to negotiate a mutually acceptable solution, is it better to claim one's payment back through Paypal or one's financial institution?

The last time I claimed through my credit union I received a stroppy email from Paypal saying that I should have gone through them and that penalties might apply if I did it again.

Also, is it better to return such goods (and hope the seller will recompense for the postage - fat chance!) or retain them, offering to return them if postage is paid along with the refund?

GG

"The Gods made Heavy Metal"
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

GG, I am surprised! I have always gone through my credit card compamy! How can paypal regulate that? Wow! Who do they (paypal) think they are? I feel like if I am using my card, I have a right to contact my card co. Anytime I have tried to get anything from paypal, it has been such a hassle.
Last edited by mrsm
Fortunately, I have only had a handful of instances where I ever had to go after a seller. In each case, PayPal maintained that they were the court of first instance. In fact, in one case, American Express--who usually backs the buyer more than other creditors--insisted that I had to go through PayPal first, since they were the merchant who posted the charge, even though it was obviously a third party charge. Made sense to me.
So if you have an ongoing dispute with a seller (or goods are dispatched surface and take two months to arrive) and you don't reverse the payment within 30 days, Paypal won't help?

My credit union had no objection to pursuing the matter for me last time so I think I'll bypass Paypal on this occasion too. What are they going to do, suspend me? That'd be their loss, not mine.

I'm fed up trying to negotiate with this seller. I've been sickeningly polite and I offered a generous compromise deal at first which would have seen me keep something I didn't really need and still paying a little too much, but all in vain, emails have been totally ignored.

His feedback is generally OK, though there was one neg in recent times to which he replied VERY nastily. Even if the buyer was at fault there's no call for that.

Reckon he'll have to learn the hard way.

GG

"The Gods made Heavy Metal"
quote:
Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
Falcon,why , do you think, Paypal insists you go through them first? The only reason I can come up with is they want a shot at refusing the refund so they can save loosing the business!


Credit card companies are not pleased when they have to go after wayward merchants. It takes time and effort (paperwork, etc.). Sometimes there is a charge to the merchant when a refund must be given. I suspect that PayPal would rather have the opportunity to ajudicate a dispute themselves, rather than take answer questions and/or take a lot of gruff from a credit card company.
quote:
Originally posted by Mrs.M.:
Falcon,why , do you think, Paypal insists you go through them first? The only reason I can come up with is they want a shot at refusing the refund so they can save loosing the business!

I really don't know, Mrs. M. I would have thought that they'd prefer people to go somewhere else first so they don't have to deal with it.
For the information of those who may be genuinely interested in learning from the experiences of others (against the day they may find themselves in a similar situation).

The card supplier will follow up the complaint, but first I have to produce a receipt to prove the item has been posted back, then there follows a 30 day wait to see if the vendor does the right thing and refunds. If not, the charge-back proceeds.

Obviously this means I won't be remunerated for the return postage, which is annoying, but as it's about 10% of the total originally paid it'll just have to be written off to experience.

GG

"The Gods made Heavy Metal"

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×