quote:
Originally posted by Camera:
I agree with Rick (that's twice in two months) that "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" without checking their own work first!
However, I think it's the nature of the box layout that makes proof reading so difficult so I have every sympathy with you Mike in this case as I used to make awful "howlers" in my postings.
Could I make a recommendation here.
Download the Google toolbar, it has a most useful form filling checker. What's more it's easy to use and you can add technical terms etc. It's also free.
However there is one snag, it doesn't check AS input because this is a pop up window! Works for most other boards though.
I pride myself on my command of the English language (including spelling!) but each time I put the Google checker on my work it finds at least 3 to 5 typos. I do know the correct spelling, but in the haste to write and post, elementary checking gets missed.
Paul
I'm with you on that, Paul.
When I am just typing a message, I have to re-read it at least once to correct it, and maybe even edit it again when I have posted it.
Because of my recent bout of dysphasia, another feature comes up - if I think ahead about a word, I type in the letters from the previous word!
A bit like 'A bike like' Weird!
Typos are usually to do with the actual layout of the keyboard - when becomes whan, file becomes fiel.
Spell checkers would highlight these, but many errors are because the wrong word has been used:
- Loose for lose
- Your for you're
- Its for it's
No spell checker would find these - one reason that things need proofreading as well.
If I am typing a serious document - quote, user guide, technical doc, web page
et al, I will re-read it a little time after I have typed it, and usually find there is something to correct.
So, you will probably find that such documents of mine are glass-house-free! If not, constructive criticism is welcome.
Your surgeon may never have had appendicitis!