It seems to me that many people are concerned about getting a neg. Why is that? I can understand a seller’s concern about getting “any”, especially a Power Seller. But, why is a buyer concerned about a “few” negs?
A seller SHOULD be concerned! Buyers bring up a seller’s feedback. It doesn’t take much to scare off a buyer.
Doesn’t the buyer have the advantage? The seller’s feedback influences buyers before the close of the auction.
A buyer will decide to bid, or not bid, based on the buyer’s feedback. The seller, not having any prior knowledge of the buyers (especially snipers), has little or no choice. Sure, the buyer can cancel a bid, but are they likely to do that if the seller has a couple of negs out of a 100 positives? Also, are they likely to do that if a sniper wins the auction? It might look like shilling.
So what if the seller sees that a buyer has a few negs (assuming they even look at the buyer’s feedback)? Might not the seller be a little more respectful towards that buyer? After all, this buyer has left negs before, so he might do it again.
When negs are exchanged, which party has more to lose; the buyer or the seller? Doesn’t it make sense that as snipers (buyers), the impact of a neg to us is less than the impact of a neg to a seller?
Perhaps there is some obsession about having perfect feedback? Actually, I think anyone (buyer or seller) with perfect feedback is asking to be abused by the other party.
And yes, I do feel better getting this off my chest.
Original Post