Steve said:
>>No, Jim. It means that so long as somebody didn't bid one increment over $1,000 ($1,025 to be exact) you'd be the winner, but at whatever price the other bidder(s) ran you up to, not $22.50. Say that the final bid from your opposition was $900. You'd win, but you'd have to pay $910. That's why it's not advisable to put a max amount in that you really wouldn't want to have to pay -- somebody might just chase you all the way up there.<<
Exactly. You will win by one increment over the next highest bidder. If the next highest bid were $22.50, then you would win at $22.75. But
if some joker put in $900, like Steve said, you would end up paying the next increment, $910 at that level. NEVER bid an amount you are not ready to pay! Bid the absolute max you would be willing to pay to get that item!
Steve also said:
>>You're on target with your guess about the reason for sniping. It's NOT to get the last bid in; it's to avoid the nickel-and-dime-run-the-bid-up crap you see so many less sophisticated bidders engage in.<<
This is SOOOOOOO true. Most of the things on which I bid are worth very little "real" money; it is collectors, buffs and sentimentalists who have the interest. But not a week passes that I don't watch people determined to have the final say--to not let the other bidder(s) win "their" auction. They view the auction more like a card game, where each player ups the ante, seeking to make the others sweat it out or fold. As a result, they end up showing their hand: their interest and willingness to bid ever higher places the other bidders on notice. In contrast, the sniper has a poker face and does nothing until the end, at which time he most frequently is the one holding the best cards.
Jim, part of why AS works so well is the fact that so many eBayers, especially newbies, play these games of one-upmanship. In other words, they DON'T bid their true maximum amounts, and are willing to keep upping the bid higher and higher, which makes the item more expensive. But if there were no one else countering their bids with higher bids, they would leave their bids alone. The guy who might have repeatedly upped his bid to $100, leaves his $25 as is, until the sniper comes along and wins for $26. The losing bidder may sometimes whine that he did not "have a chance" to bid higher, but he DID have the same chance, and simply chose to play lowball bid.
You may ask, "Then why not simply bid on the auction manually, even days away, and place that $100 bid? If the other bidders are not willing to bid that high, you would still win." This is partially true. In some cases you would win, simply because you bid your max and no one else was willing to pay. But in others you would not win, because the same guy who would have nickel-and-dimed his bids up to $100 (bidding six times with some other bidder, during a war), may see your bid and answered with an even higher one. But if you don't give him the opportunity to do that, there is a probablity that his bid will stay at that $25 mark, because emotionally speaking, that's how things work.
ONLY bid what you are willing to pay! But with AS bidding for you--freeing you from having to sit by the computer--you WILL win MOST of the time, certainly far more than you ever did on your own! The only down side is the auctions you do lose, because someone else paid more. I say "the down side" because I find that I win 95% of my auctions with AS, and I am so accustomed to winning, that the rare loss stings even more!
What a great way to end post #100!